Progress in Plant Protection

Endofity z liści tytoniu jako potencjalne stymulatory wzrostu i czynniki kontroli biologicznej u pszenicy ozimej
Tobacco leaf endophytes as potential growth promoters and biocontrol agents in winter wheat

Anna Hoffmann, e-mail: a.hoffmann@iorpib.poznan.pl

Instytut Ochrony Roślin – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Władysława Węgorka 20, 60-318 Poznań, Polska

Weronika Zenelt, e-mail: w.zenelt@iorpib.poznan.pl

Instytut Ochrony Roślin – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Władysława Węgorka 20, 60-318 Poznań, Polska

Katarzyna Sadowska, e-mail: k.sadowska@iorpib.poznan.pl

Instytut Ochrony Roślin – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Władysława Węgorka 20, 60-318 Poznań, Polska

Krzysztof Krawczyk, e-mail: k.krawczyk@iorpib.poznan.pl

Instytut Ochrony Roślin – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Władysława Węgorka 20, 60-318 Poznań, Polska
Abstract

Bakterie endofityczne odgrywają kluczową rolę w utrzymaniu zdrowia roślin działając jako bakterie promujące wzrost (PGPB) oraz czyn­niki biokontroli zwalczające patogeny roślinne. Celem pracy była ocena potencjału bakterii endofitycznych wyizolowanych z liści tytoniu (Nicotiana tabacum L.) do stymulowania wzrostu pszenicy ozimej (Triticum aestivum L.), a także do ograniczania rozwoju patogennych grzybów Fusarium oxysporum i Fusarium solani. Dwadzieścia izolatów bakteryjnych przebadano pod kątem właściwości biochemicznych, tolerancji na zasolenie oraz aktywności antagonistycznej wobec patogenów grzybowych. Cztery szczepy (Glutamicibacter halophytocola, Bacillus mobilis, Microbacterium paraoxydans i Huaxiibacter chinensis) uznano za najbardziej obiecujące ze względu na ich zdolność do promowania wzrostu roślin oraz hamowania rozwoju grzybów. Doświadczenia szklarniowe potwierdziły ich pozytywny wpływ na wzrost pszenicy, wykazując istotny statystycznie przyrost w porównaniu z grupą kontrolną: długości łodygi (do 22,3%), świeżej biomasy (do 65,3%) oraz suchej biomasy (do 44,0%). Należy jednak zaznaczyć, że choć aktywność przeciwgrzybowa była wyraźna w warunkach in vitro, nie przełożyła się na mierzalną redukcję objawów chorobowych w warunkach szklarniowych. Wyniki te podkreślają zarówno potencjał, jak i ograniczenia endofitów pochodzących z tytoniu. Badanie to dostarcza wstępnych informacji na temat możliwości ich wy­korzystania w rolnictwie zrównoważonym jako bionawozów oraz biologicznych środków ochrony roślin. Dalsze prace badawcze powinny koncentrować się na wyjaśnieniu mechanizmów ich działania oraz ocenie skuteczności w warunkach polowych, co pozwoli na optymali­zację strategii ich aplikacji.

 

Endophytic bacteria play a crucial role in plant health, acting as plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) and biocontrol agents against plant pathogens. This study aimed to evaluate the potential of endophytic bacteria isolated from tobacco leaves (Nicotiana tabacum L.) to promote winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) growth and inhibit the growth of the pathogenic fungi Fusarium oxysporum andFusarium solani. Twenty bacterial strains were screened for their biochemical traits, salt tolerance, and antagonistic activity against fungal pathogens. Four strains (Glutamicibacter halophytocola, Bacillus mobilis, Microbacterium paraoxydans, and Huaxiibacter chinensis) were identified as the most promising due to their ability to enhance plant growth and inhibit fungal growth. Greenhouse trials confirmed their growth-promoting effects, with significant increases up to 22.3% in stem length, fresh biomass up to 65.3%, and dry biomass upto 44.0% compared to the control. However, while antifungal activity was evident in vitro, it did not result in a measurable reduction of disease symptoms under greenhouse conditions. These findings highlight the dual potential and limitations of tobacco-derived endo­phytes. This study provides preliminary insight into their possible use as biofertilizers and biocontrol agents in sustainable agriculture. Further research should focus on elucidating their mechanisms of action and testing their performance in field conditions to optimize application strategies.

Key words
bakterie endofityczne; PGPB; Triticum aestivum; biokontrola; grzyby patogeniczne; endophytic bacteria; biocontrol; pathogenic fungi
References

Ali M.A., Ahmed T., Ibrahim E., Rizwan M., Chong K.P., Yong J.W.H. 2024. A review on mechanisms and prospects of endophytic bacteria in biocontrol of plant pathogenic fungi and their plant growth-promoting activities. Heliyon 10 (11): e31573. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31573

 

Aquino J.P.A., Macedo Junior F.B., Antunes J.E.L., Figueiredo M.V.B., Alcântara Neto F.A., Araujo A.S.F. 2019. Plant growth- -promoting endophytic bacteria on maize and sorghum. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Tropical 49: e56241. DOI: 10.1590/1983- 40632019v4956241

 

Chen Y., Cai H., Wu X., Wang X., Shang Y., Wei Q., Sha W., Qi Y., Liu S., Zhang H. 2025. Identification and pathogenicity analysis of Huaxiibacter chinensis Qf-1 in mink (Neogale vison). Microorganisms 13 (7): 1604. DOI: 10.3390/microorgan­isms13071604

 

Coleman Lab. 2021. Genomic DNA extraction with CTAB (Cetyl trimethylammonium bromide). http://coleman-lab.org/wp-con­tent/uploads/2021/04/Genomic-DNA-extraction-with-CTAB.pdf [dostęp: 22.05.2026].

 

Fialho de Oliveira M., Germano da Silva M., Van Der Sand S.T. 2010. Anti-phytopathogen potential of endophytic actinobacteria isolated from tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum) in southern Brazil, and characterization of Streptomyces sp. R18(6), a potential biocontrol agent. Research in Microbiology 161 (7): 565–572. DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2010.05.008

 

Fu B., Olawole O., Beattie G.A. 2021. Biological control and microbial ecology draft genome sequence data of Glutamicibacter sp. FBE-19, a bacterium antagonistic to the plant pathogen Erwinia tracheiphila. Phytopathology 111 (4): 765–768. DOI: 10.1094/ PHYTO-09-20-0380-A

 

Gao D., Tao Y. 2012. Current molecular biologic techniques for characterizing environmental microbial community. Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering in China 6 (1): 82–97. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-011-0306-6

 

Ghodsalavi B., Ahmadzadeh M., Soleimani M., Madloo P., Taghizad-Farid R. 2013. Isolation and characterization of rhizobacteria and their effects on root extracts of Valeriana officinalis. Australian Journal of Crop Science 7 (3): 338–344.

 

Go W.Z., Chin K.L., H’ng P.S., Wong M.Y., Lee C.L., Khoo P.S. 2023. Exploring the biocontrol efficacy of Trichoderma spp. against Rigidoporus microporus, the causal agent of white root rot disease in rubber trees (Hevea brasiliensis). Plants 12 (5): 1066. DOI: 10.3390/plants12051066

 

Hall T.A. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/ NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95–98.

 

Hankin L., Anagnostakis S.L. 1977. Solid media containing carboxymethylcellulose to detect Cx cellulase activity of microorgan­isms. Journal of General Microbiology 98 (1): 109–115. DOI: 10.1099/00221287-98-1-109

 

Hoffmann A., Lischeid G., Koch M., Lentzsch P., Sommerfeld T., Müller M.E.H. 2021. Co-cultivation of Fusarium, Alternaria, and Pseudomonas on wheat-ears affects microbial growth and mycotoxin production. Microorganisms 9 (2): 443. DOI: 10.3390/ microorganisms9020443

 

Jiang W., Liu J., He Y., Payizila A., Li Y. 2024. Biological control ability and antifungal activities of Bacillus velezensis Bv S3 against Fusarium oxysporum that causes rice seedling blight. Agronomy 14 (1): 167. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy14010167

 

Khanna A., Raj K., Kumar P., Wati L. 2022. Antagonistic and growth-promoting potential of multifarious bacterial endophytes against Fusarium wilt of chickpea. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control 32 (1): 17. DOI: 10.1186/s41938-022-00516-8

 

Kikuchi Y., Sameshima S., Kitade O., Kojima J. 2002. Novel clade of Rickettsia spp. from leeches. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 68 (2): 999–1004. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.2.999

 

Krawczyk K., Zwolińska A., Kamasa J., Maćkowiak A., Przemieniecki S. 2016. Identyfikacja i charakterystyka bakterii endofityc­znych wykazujących cechy promujące wzrost roślin. Progress in Plant Protection 56 (1): 100–109. DOI: 10.14199/ppp-2016- 018

 

Liu Y., Morelli M., Koskimäki J.J., Qin S., Zhu Y., Zhang X. 2022. Editorial: Role of endophytic bacteria in improving plant stress resistance. Frontiers in Plant Science 13: 1106701. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1106701

 

Lovecká P., Kroneislová G., Novotná Z., Röderová J., Demnerova K. 2023. Plant growth-promoting endophytic bacteria iso­lated from Miscanthus giganteus and their antifungal activity. Microorganisms 11 (11): 2710. DOI: 10.3390/microorgan­isms11112710

 

McLaughlin M.S., Roy M., Abbasi P.A., Carisse O., Yurgel S.N., Ali S. 2023. Why do we need alternative methods for fungal disease management in plants? Plants 12 (22): 3822. DOI: 10.3390/plants12223822

 

Negi R., Sharma B., Kumar S., Kumar K., Tanvir C., Rubee K. 2024. Plant endophytes: unveiling hidden applications toward agro‑environment sustainability. Folia Microbiologica 69 (1): 181–206. DOI: 10.1007/s12223-023-01092-6

 

Nicholas K.B., Nicholas H.B., Deerfield D.W., Gauch H. 1997. Genedoc: a tool for editing and annotating multiple sequence align­ments. Ieee Software 1 (1): 1–8.

 

Oerke E.C. 2006. Crop losses to pests. The Journal of Agricultural Science 144 (1): 31–43. DOI: 10.1017/S0021859605005708

 

Oukala N., Pastor V., Aissat K. 2021. Bacterial endophytes: the hidden actor in plant immune responses against biotic stress. Plants 10 (5): 1012. DOI: 10.3390/plants10051012

 

Pertot I., Giovannini O., Benanchi M., Caffi T., Rossi V., Mugnai L. 2017. Combining biocontrol agents with different mecha­nisms of action in a strategy to control Botrytis cinerea on grapevine. Crop Protection 97: 85–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro. 2017.01.010

 

Qin S., Feng W.W., Zhang Y.J., Wang T.T., Xiong Y.W., Xing K. 2018. Diversity of bacterial microbiota of coastal halophyte Limo­nium sinense and amelioration of salinity stress damage. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 84 (19): e01533-18. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01533-18

 

Rakhalaru P., Mampholo B.M., Mamphogoro T.P., Thantsha M.S. 2025. Endophytic and epiphytic microorganisms as biocontrol agents: mechanisms, applications, and metagenomic approaches in tomato cultivation. Molecules 30 (18): 3816. DOI: 10.3390/ molecules30183816

 

Santoyo G., Moreno-Hagelsieb G., del Carmen Orozco-Mosqueda M., Glick B.R. 2016. Plant growth-promoting bacterial endo­phytes. Microbiological Research 183: 92–99. DOI: 10.1016/j.micres.2015.11.008

 

Sasirekha B., Srividya S. 2016. Siderophore production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa FP6, a biocontrol strain for Rhizoctonia solani and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides causing diseases in chilli. Agriculture and Natural Resources 50 (4): 250–256. DOI: 10.1016/j.anres.2016.02.003

 

Savary S., Willocquet L., Pethybridge S.J., Esker P., McRoberts N., Nelson A. 2019. The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops. Nature Ecology & Evolution 3 (3): 430–439. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-018-0793-y

 

Schaad N.W., Jones J.B., Chun W. 2001. Laboratory Guide for Identification of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria. APS Press, St. Paul, MN, 373 ss. ISBN 0-89054-263-5.

 

Semenzato G., Fani R. 2024. Endophytic bacteria: a sustainable strategy for enhancing medicinal plant cultivation and preserving microbial diversity. Frontiers in Microbiology 15: 1477465. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1477465

 

Sen A., Saji J., Faseela P., Zhang C., Mohanan S., Xia Y. 2026. Exploring the functional roles of endophytic bacteria in plant stress tolerance for sustainable agriculture: diversity, mechanisms, applications, and challenges. Plants 15 (2): 206. DOI: 10.3390/ plants15020206

 

Setiawati M.R., Suryatmana P., Hindersah R., Fitriatin B.N., Nurbaity A., Herdiyantoro D., Kamaluddin N.N., Simarmata T. 2018. Characteristic and capability of plant growth promoting endophytic bacteria of rice plant tissue in saline ecosystem. Asian Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Environmental Sciences 20 (3): 791–797.

 

Sharma S., Kumar V., Tripathi R.B. 2011. Isolation of phosphate solubilizing microorganism (PSMs) from soil. Journal of Micro­biology and Biotechnology Research 1 (2): 90–95.

 

Simlat M., Ptak A., Jaglarz A., Szewczyk A., Dziurka M., Gurgul A. 2023. Seeds of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni as a source of plant growth-promoting endophytic bacteria with the potential to synthesize rebaudioside A. International Journal of Molecular Sci­ences 24 (3): 2174. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24032174

 

Todorović I., Moënne-Loccoz Y., Raičević V., Jovičić-Petrović J., Muller D. 2023. Microbial diversity in soils suppressive to Fusarium diseases. Frontiers in Plant Science 14: 1228749. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1228749

 

Toral L., Rodríguez M., Béjar V., Sampedro I. 2018. Antifungal activity of lipopeptides from Bacillus XT1 CECT 8661 against Botrytis cinerea. Frontiers in Microbiology 9: 13–15. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01315

 

Tripathi S., Kamal S., Sheramati I., Oelmuller R., Varma A. 2008. Mycorrhizal fungi and other root endophytes as biocontrol agents against root pathogens. s. 281–307. W: Mycorrhiza. Third edition (A. Varma, red.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 797 ss. ISBN 978-3-540-78824-9. e-ISBN 978-3-540-78826-3. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-78826-3

 

White T.J., Bruns T.D., Lee S.B., Taylor J.W. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. s. 315–322. W: PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications (M.A. Innis, D.H. Gelfand, J.J. Sninsky, T.J. White, red.). Academic Press, San Diego, 482 ss. ISBN 0-08-088671-X. ISBN 978-0-080-88671-8.

 

Yuan X., Cao M., Liu X., Du Y., Shen G. 2018. Composition and genetic diversity of the Nicotiana tabacum microbiome in different topographic areas and growth periods. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19 (11): 3421. DOI: 10.3390/ijms19113421

 

Zhang M., Li H., Miao P., Wang H., Xu M., Yang J., Yang J., Kang Y. 2024. Microbial community composition and their activity against Phytophthora nicotianae at different growth stages of tobacco. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control 34: 63. DOI: 10.1186/s41938-024-00831-2

 

Zhang Q., Zhang J., Yang L., Zhang L., Jiang D., Chen W., Li G. 2014. Diversity and biocontrol potential of endophytic fungi in Brassica napus. Biological Control 72: 98–108. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2014.02.018

Progress in Plant Protection (2026) : 0-0
First published on-line: 2026-06-11 13:46:49
http://dx.doi.org/10.14199/ppp-2026-007
Full text (.PDF) BibTeX Mendeley Back to list