Endofity z liści tytoniu jako potencjalne stymulatory wzrostu i czynniki kontroli biologicznej u pszenicy ozimej
Tobacco leaf endophytes as potential growth promoters and biocontrol agents in winter wheat
Anna Hoffmann, e-mail: a.hoffmann@iorpib.poznan.pl
Instytut Ochrony Roślin – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Władysława Węgorka 20, 60-318 Poznań, PolskaWeronika Zenelt, e-mail: w.zenelt@iorpib.poznan.pl
Instytut Ochrony Roślin – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Władysława Węgorka 20, 60-318 Poznań, PolskaKatarzyna Sadowska, e-mail: k.sadowska@iorpib.poznan.pl
Instytut Ochrony Roślin – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Władysława Węgorka 20, 60-318 Poznań, PolskaKrzysztof Krawczyk, e-mail: k.krawczyk@iorpib.poznan.pl
Instytut Ochrony Roślin – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Władysława Węgorka 20, 60-318 Poznań, Polska| Streszczenie |
Bakterie endofityczne odgrywają kluczową rolę w utrzymaniu zdrowia roślin działając jako bakterie promujące wzrost (PGPB) oraz czynniki biokontroli zwalczające patogeny roślinne. Celem pracy była ocena potencjału bakterii endofitycznych wyizolowanych z liści tytoniu (Nicotiana tabacum L.) do stymulowania wzrostu pszenicy ozimej (Triticum aestivum L.), a także do ograniczania rozwoju patogennych grzybów Fusarium oxysporum i Fusarium solani. Dwadzieścia izolatów bakteryjnych przebadano pod kątem właściwości biochemicznych, tolerancji na zasolenie oraz aktywności antagonistycznej wobec patogenów grzybowych. Cztery szczepy (Glutamicibacter halophytocola, Bacillus mobilis, Microbacterium paraoxydans i Huaxiibacter chinensis) uznano za najbardziej obiecujące ze względu na ich zdolność do promowania wzrostu roślin oraz hamowania rozwoju grzybów. Doświadczenia szklarniowe potwierdziły ich pozytywny wpływ na wzrost pszenicy, wykazując istotny statystycznie przyrost w porównaniu z grupą kontrolną: długości łodygi (do 22,3%), świeżej biomasy (do 65,3%) oraz suchej biomasy (do 44,0%). Należy jednak zaznaczyć, że choć aktywność przeciwgrzybowa była wyraźna w warunkach in vitro, nie przełożyła się na mierzalną redukcję objawów chorobowych w warunkach szklarniowych. Wyniki te podkreślają zarówno potencjał, jak i ograniczenia endofitów pochodzących z tytoniu. Badanie to dostarcza wstępnych informacji na temat możliwości ich wykorzystania w rolnictwie zrównoważonym jako bionawozów oraz biologicznych środków ochrony roślin. Dalsze prace badawcze powinny koncentrować się na wyjaśnieniu mechanizmów ich działania oraz ocenie skuteczności w warunkach polowych, co pozwoli na optymalizację strategii ich aplikacji.
Endophytic bacteria play a crucial role in plant health, acting as plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) and biocontrol agents against plant pathogens. This study aimed to evaluate the potential of endophytic bacteria isolated from tobacco leaves (Nicotiana tabacum L.) to promote winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) growth and inhibit the growth of the pathogenic fungi Fusarium oxysporum andFusarium solani. Twenty bacterial strains were screened for their biochemical traits, salt tolerance, and antagonistic activity against fungal pathogens. Four strains (Glutamicibacter halophytocola, Bacillus mobilis, Microbacterium paraoxydans, and Huaxiibacter chinensis) were identified as the most promising due to their ability to enhance plant growth and inhibit fungal growth. Greenhouse trials confirmed their growth-promoting effects, with significant increases up to 22.3% in stem length, fresh biomass up to 65.3%, and dry biomass upto 44.0% compared to the control. However, while antifungal activity was evident in vitro, it did not result in a measurable reduction of disease symptoms under greenhouse conditions. These findings highlight the dual potential and limitations of tobacco-derived endophytes. This study provides preliminary insight into their possible use as biofertilizers and biocontrol agents in sustainable agriculture. Further research should focus on elucidating their mechanisms of action and testing their performance in field conditions to optimize application strategies. |
| Słowa kluczowe |
| bakterie endofityczne; PGPB; Triticum aestivum; biokontrola; grzyby patogeniczne; endophytic bacteria; biocontrol; pathogenic fungi |
| Referencje |
|
Ali M.A., Ahmed T., Ibrahim E., Rizwan M., Chong K.P., Yong J.W.H. 2024. A review on mechanisms and prospects of endophytic bacteria in biocontrol of plant pathogenic fungi and their plant growth-promoting activities. Heliyon 10 (11): e31573. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31573
Aquino J.P.A., Macedo Junior F.B., Antunes J.E.L., Figueiredo M.V.B., Alcântara Neto F.A., Araujo A.S.F. 2019. Plant growth- -promoting endophytic bacteria on maize and sorghum. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Tropical 49: e56241. DOI: 10.1590/1983- 40632019v4956241
Chen Y., Cai H., Wu X., Wang X., Shang Y., Wei Q., Sha W., Qi Y., Liu S., Zhang H. 2025. Identification and pathogenicity analysis of Huaxiibacter chinensis Qf-1 in mink (Neogale vison). Microorganisms 13 (7): 1604. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms13071604
Coleman Lab. 2021. Genomic DNA extraction with CTAB (Cetyl trimethylammonium bromide). http://coleman-lab.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Genomic-DNA-extraction-with-CTAB.pdf [dostęp: 22.05.2026].
Fialho de Oliveira M., Germano da Silva M., Van Der Sand S.T. 2010. Anti-phytopathogen potential of endophytic actinobacteria isolated from tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum) in southern Brazil, and characterization of Streptomyces sp. R18(6), a potential biocontrol agent. Research in Microbiology 161 (7): 565–572. DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2010.05.008
Fu B., Olawole O., Beattie G.A. 2021. Biological control and microbial ecology draft genome sequence data of Glutamicibacter sp. FBE-19, a bacterium antagonistic to the plant pathogen Erwinia tracheiphila. Phytopathology 111 (4): 765–768. DOI: 10.1094/ PHYTO-09-20-0380-A
Gao D., Tao Y. 2012. Current molecular biologic techniques for characterizing environmental microbial community. Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering in China 6 (1): 82–97. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-011-0306-6
Ghodsalavi B., Ahmadzadeh M., Soleimani M., Madloo P., Taghizad-Farid R. 2013. Isolation and characterization of rhizobacteria and their effects on root extracts of Valeriana officinalis. Australian Journal of Crop Science 7 (3): 338–344.
Go W.Z., Chin K.L., H’ng P.S., Wong M.Y., Lee C.L., Khoo P.S. 2023. Exploring the biocontrol efficacy of Trichoderma spp. against Rigidoporus microporus, the causal agent of white root rot disease in rubber trees (Hevea brasiliensis). Plants 12 (5): 1066. DOI: 10.3390/plants12051066
Hall T.A. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/ NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95–98.
Hankin L., Anagnostakis S.L. 1977. Solid media containing carboxymethylcellulose to detect Cx cellulase activity of microorganisms. Journal of General Microbiology 98 (1): 109–115. DOI: 10.1099/00221287-98-1-109
Hoffmann A., Lischeid G., Koch M., Lentzsch P., Sommerfeld T., Müller M.E.H. 2021. Co-cultivation of Fusarium, Alternaria, and Pseudomonas on wheat-ears affects microbial growth and mycotoxin production. Microorganisms 9 (2): 443. DOI: 10.3390/ microorganisms9020443
Jiang W., Liu J., He Y., Payizila A., Li Y. 2024. Biological control ability and antifungal activities of Bacillus velezensis Bv S3 against Fusarium oxysporum that causes rice seedling blight. Agronomy 14 (1): 167. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy14010167
Khanna A., Raj K., Kumar P., Wati L. 2022. Antagonistic and growth-promoting potential of multifarious bacterial endophytes against Fusarium wilt of chickpea. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control 32 (1): 17. DOI: 10.1186/s41938-022-00516-8
Kikuchi Y., Sameshima S., Kitade O., Kojima J. 2002. Novel clade of Rickettsia spp. from leeches. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 68 (2): 999–1004. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.2.999
Krawczyk K., Zwolińska A., Kamasa J., Maćkowiak A., Przemieniecki S. 2016. Identyfikacja i charakterystyka bakterii endofitycznych wykazujących cechy promujące wzrost roślin. Progress in Plant Protection 56 (1): 100–109. DOI: 10.14199/ppp-2016- 018
Liu Y., Morelli M., Koskimäki J.J., Qin S., Zhu Y., Zhang X. 2022. Editorial: Role of endophytic bacteria in improving plant stress resistance. Frontiers in Plant Science 13: 1106701. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1106701
Lovecká P., Kroneislová G., Novotná Z., Röderová J., Demnerova K. 2023. Plant growth-promoting endophytic bacteria isolated from Miscanthus giganteus and their antifungal activity. Microorganisms 11 (11): 2710. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11112710
McLaughlin M.S., Roy M., Abbasi P.A., Carisse O., Yurgel S.N., Ali S. 2023. Why do we need alternative methods for fungal disease management in plants? Plants 12 (22): 3822. DOI: 10.3390/plants12223822
Negi R., Sharma B., Kumar S., Kumar K., Tanvir C., Rubee K. 2024. Plant endophytes: unveiling hidden applications toward agro‑environment sustainability. Folia Microbiologica 69 (1): 181–206. DOI: 10.1007/s12223-023-01092-6
Nicholas K.B., Nicholas H.B., Deerfield D.W., Gauch H. 1997. Genedoc: a tool for editing and annotating multiple sequence alignments. Ieee Software 1 (1): 1–8.
Oerke E.C. 2006. Crop losses to pests. The Journal of Agricultural Science 144 (1): 31–43. DOI: 10.1017/S0021859605005708
Oukala N., Pastor V., Aissat K. 2021. Bacterial endophytes: the hidden actor in plant immune responses against biotic stress. Plants 10 (5): 1012. DOI: 10.3390/plants10051012
Pertot I., Giovannini O., Benanchi M., Caffi T., Rossi V., Mugnai L. 2017. Combining biocontrol agents with different mechanisms of action in a strategy to control Botrytis cinerea on grapevine. Crop Protection 97: 85–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro. 2017.01.010
Qin S., Feng W.W., Zhang Y.J., Wang T.T., Xiong Y.W., Xing K. 2018. Diversity of bacterial microbiota of coastal halophyte Limonium sinense and amelioration of salinity stress damage. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 84 (19): e01533-18. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01533-18
Rakhalaru P., Mampholo B.M., Mamphogoro T.P., Thantsha M.S. 2025. Endophytic and epiphytic microorganisms as biocontrol agents: mechanisms, applications, and metagenomic approaches in tomato cultivation. Molecules 30 (18): 3816. DOI: 10.3390/ molecules30183816
Santoyo G., Moreno-Hagelsieb G., del Carmen Orozco-Mosqueda M., Glick B.R. 2016. Plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes. Microbiological Research 183: 92–99. DOI: 10.1016/j.micres.2015.11.008
Sasirekha B., Srividya S. 2016. Siderophore production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa FP6, a biocontrol strain for Rhizoctonia solani and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides causing diseases in chilli. Agriculture and Natural Resources 50 (4): 250–256. DOI: 10.1016/j.anres.2016.02.003
Savary S., Willocquet L., Pethybridge S.J., Esker P., McRoberts N., Nelson A. 2019. The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops. Nature Ecology & Evolution 3 (3): 430–439. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-018-0793-y
Schaad N.W., Jones J.B., Chun W. 2001. Laboratory Guide for Identification of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria. APS Press, St. Paul, MN, 373 ss. ISBN 0-89054-263-5.
Semenzato G., Fani R. 2024. Endophytic bacteria: a sustainable strategy for enhancing medicinal plant cultivation and preserving microbial diversity. Frontiers in Microbiology 15: 1477465. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1477465
Sen A., Saji J., Faseela P., Zhang C., Mohanan S., Xia Y. 2026. Exploring the functional roles of endophytic bacteria in plant stress tolerance for sustainable agriculture: diversity, mechanisms, applications, and challenges. Plants 15 (2): 206. DOI: 10.3390/ plants15020206
Setiawati M.R., Suryatmana P., Hindersah R., Fitriatin B.N., Nurbaity A., Herdiyantoro D., Kamaluddin N.N., Simarmata T. 2018. Characteristic and capability of plant growth promoting endophytic bacteria of rice plant tissue in saline ecosystem. Asian Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Environmental Sciences 20 (3): 791–797.
Sharma S., Kumar V., Tripathi R.B. 2011. Isolation of phosphate solubilizing microorganism (PSMs) from soil. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology Research 1 (2): 90–95.
Simlat M., Ptak A., Jaglarz A., Szewczyk A., Dziurka M., Gurgul A. 2023. Seeds of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni as a source of plant growth-promoting endophytic bacteria with the potential to synthesize rebaudioside A. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24 (3): 2174. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24032174
Todorović I., Moënne-Loccoz Y., Raičević V., Jovičić-Petrović J., Muller D. 2023. Microbial diversity in soils suppressive to Fusarium diseases. Frontiers in Plant Science 14: 1228749. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1228749
Toral L., Rodríguez M., Béjar V., Sampedro I. 2018. Antifungal activity of lipopeptides from Bacillus XT1 CECT 8661 against Botrytis cinerea. Frontiers in Microbiology 9: 13–15. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01315
Tripathi S., Kamal S., Sheramati I., Oelmuller R., Varma A. 2008. Mycorrhizal fungi and other root endophytes as biocontrol agents against root pathogens. s. 281–307. W: Mycorrhiza. Third edition (A. Varma, red.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 797 ss. ISBN 978-3-540-78824-9. e-ISBN 978-3-540-78826-3. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-78826-3
White T.J., Bruns T.D., Lee S.B., Taylor J.W. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. s. 315–322. W: PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications (M.A. Innis, D.H. Gelfand, J.J. Sninsky, T.J. White, red.). Academic Press, San Diego, 482 ss. ISBN 0-08-088671-X. ISBN 978-0-080-88671-8.
Yuan X., Cao M., Liu X., Du Y., Shen G. 2018. Composition and genetic diversity of the Nicotiana tabacum microbiome in different topographic areas and growth periods. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19 (11): 3421. DOI: 10.3390/ijms19113421
Zhang M., Li H., Miao P., Wang H., Xu M., Yang J., Yang J., Kang Y. 2024. Microbial community composition and their activity against Phytophthora nicotianae at different growth stages of tobacco. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control 34: 63. DOI: 10.1186/s41938-024-00831-2
Zhang Q., Zhang J., Yang L., Zhang L., Jiang D., Chen W., Li G. 2014. Diversity and biocontrol potential of endophytic fungi in Brassica napus. Biological Control 72: 98–108. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2014.02.018 |
| Progress in Plant Protection (2026) : 0-0 |
| Data pierwszej publikacji on-line: 2026-06-11 13:46:49 |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.14199/ppp-2026-007 |
| Pełny tekst (.PDF) BibTeX Mendeley Powrót do listy |


